How it worksResearchFAQBlog
Back to blog Leadership

Proving impact to governors and the local authority

Evidencing provision should not mean a week of spreadsheets. What a clear impact picture looks like, and how to build one.

Every trust is asked to show that its SEND provision works. Governors want assurance, the local authority wants evidence, and parents want to know their child is making progress. Too often, answering takes a week of stitching spreadsheets together.

The question behind the question

When a governor asks whether support is working, they are really asking three things: is support reaching the pupils who need it, is it good quality, and is it connected to progress. A clear impact picture answers all three from the same source, rather than three separate exports that never quite agree.

What good evidence looks like

Strong evidence tends to share a few features:

  • It starts from need, not from spend
  • It shows change over time, not a single snapshot
  • It connects support to outcomes without claiming more than it can
  • It is the same picture leaders use day to day, not a version made for the meeting

Build it once

The most useful thing a trust can do is stop rebuilding the evidence each time it is asked. When the working view and the reporting view are the same view, assurance stops being a project and becomes a by-product of doing the work.

Continue reading

Inclusion strategy

Where every support hour actually lands

Most trusts can say how much SEND support they fund. Far fewer can show where it lands, or whether it reaches the pupils who need it most.

Product

The SEND Efficiency Index, explained

One number for how well support is used. Here is what goes into the SEI, and just as importantly, what it deliberately leaves out.

Practice

RAG ratings are a starting point, not a verdict

A red cell is a prompt for a conversation, not a failing grade. How to read the register without jumping to conclusions.